State of Connecticut Notary Public Manual

State of Connecticut Notary Public Manual Denise W. Merrill Secretary of the State Prepared by Office of the Secretary of the State Revised June 2020 Table of Contents . 1 1.0 THE NOTARY PUBLIC . 1 1.1 A PUBLIC OFFICIAL . 1 1.2 HISTORY . 1 2.0 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT AS A NOTARY PUBLIC . 2 2.1 APPLICATION AND FEE . 2 2.2 EXAMINATION . 2 2.3 PENDING APPLICATIONS . 2 2.4 DENIAL OF APPOINTMENT . 2 3.0 APPOINTMENT OF THE NOTARY PUBLIC . 2 3.1 CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT . 2 3.2 RECORDING OF APPOINTMENT AND OATH OF OFFICE . 3 3.3 APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT . 3 3.4 LATE RENEWAL . 4 3.5 CHANGE OF NAME OR ADDRESS AND REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATES . 4 3.6 RESIGNATION OR DEATH OF A NOTARY PUBLIC . 4 4.0 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE NOTARY PUBLIC . 5 4.1 POWERS OF THE NOTARY PUBLIC . 5 4.2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 5 4.2.1 Refusal of Service . 6 4.3 COMPETENCE . 6 4.4 DETERMINING IDENTITY . 7 4.5 CREDIBLE WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT . 7 4.6 PERFORMING NOTORIAL ACTS FOR MINORS . 7 4.7 SIGNATURE BY MARK . 8 4.8 OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS . 8 4.9 AFFIDAVITS . 9 4.10 DEPOSITIONS AND SUBPOENAS TO DEPONENTS . 10 4.11 COPY CERTIFICATION . 10 4.12 THE NOTARY'S SIGNATURE . 10 4.13 THE NOTARY'S SEAL . 11 4.14 CHANGES, RESIGNATIONS, LOST OR STOLEN SEALS AND STAMPS . 11 4.15 INFLUENCE . 12 4.16 QUALIFICATION . 12 4.17 PROHIBITED ACT . 12 4.18 NOTARY PUBLIC JOURNALS . 12 4.19 WILLS AND “LIVING WILLS” AND POWER OF ATTORNEY . 13 5.0 ADDITIONAL USEFUL INFORMATION FOR NOTARIES PUBLIC . 13 5.1 NOTARIES PUBLIC APPOINTED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS . 13 5.2 CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE FACTS . 13 5.3 TRANSLATIONS . 14 5.4 FOREIGN LANGUAGE DOCUMENTS . 14 5.5 AUTHENTICATION . 14 6.0 LIABILITY, BONDING AND INSURANCE . 14 7.0 DISCIPLINARY ACTION . 15 8.0 NOTARY FEES . 15 9.0 THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE STATE . 15 10.0 SPECIAL NOTES . 16 APPENDIX A . 17 QUESTIONS COMMONLY ASKED BY NOTARIES . 17 APPENDIX B . 19 STATUTES EFFECTING NOTARIES PUBLIC .

7. Access to Justice Contents Summary 191 Access to justice issues 192 Eligibility to stand trial 194 The test of unfitness 195 Assistance and support 199 Reform of the test 200 Limits on detention 206 Conducting civil litigation 210 Litigation representatives 211 The role of litigation representatives 215 Solicitors’ duties 220 Witnesses 224 Competence 225 Assistance in giving evidence 227 Guidance for judicial officers 231 Forensic procedures 232 Jury service 234 Juries in the Federal Court 236 Qualification to serve on a jury 237 Assistance for jurors 239 Jury secrecy 240 Summary 7.1 This chapter discusses issues concerning decision-making ability that have implications for access to justice. Persons with disability may be involved in court processes in a number of different roles, including as parties and witnesses in criminal and civil proceedings. 7.2 In this chapter, the ALRC examines a range of Commonwealth laws and legal frameworks affecting people involved in court proceedings. 1 The issues discussed affect people as: 1 The issues discussed in this chapter do not arise in the same way in tribunal proceedings, which involve merits review of government decisions, and are generally less formal and adversarial than in the courts. There is no equivalent, for example, of rules about the competency of witnesses: see Matthew Groves, ‘Do Administrative Tribunals Have to Be Satisfied of the Competence of Parties Before Them?’ (2013) 20 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 133. 192 Equality, Capacity and Disability in Commonwealth Laws · defendants in criminal proceedings—the concept of unfitness to stand trial; · parties to civil proceedings—the appointment and role of litigation representatives; · witnesses in criminal or civil proceedings—giving evidence as a witness, and consenting to the taking of forensic samples; and · potential jurors—qualification for jury service.

Injunctive Relief Against the Unlicensed Practice of Law As Represented by Drafting of Legal Instruments

Washington Law Review Volume 8 Number 1 5-1-1933 Injunctive Relief Against the Unlicensed Practice of Law as Represented by Drafting of Legal Instruments Warren L. Shattuck University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Warren L. Shattuck, Notes and Comments, Injunctive Relief Against the Unlicensed Practice of Law as Represented by Drafting of Legal Instruments, 8 Wash. L. Rev. 33 (1933). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol8/iss1/3 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW Published Quarterly by the Law School of the University of Washington Founded by John T. Condon, First Dean of the Law School SUBSCRIPTION PRICE $2.50 PER ANNUM, SINGLE COPIES $1.00 i- H. !X0oTTLA N.NgtrznOt FLAwx L. fcHn--. . . _A ssoctate Editor LESLIE J. AYE. -Associate Editor, Bench and Bar JoHN RITCHnE, III . . . . Bus ness Manager STUDENT EDITORIAL BOARD Jack C. Pearl, President Wilbur J. Lawrence, Article Editor Bryant R. Dunn, Case Editor Albert A. King, Note Editor Leo A. Chaikin, Student Bus. Mgr. Paul M. Goode Harold Hestness Anthony M. Ursich Clarence A. Hardesty Paul Lemargie Monroe Watt Byron E. Congdon George

Department of Financial Institutions State of Wisconsin Notary Public Information Last updated May 2020 DFI/NOT/102-P(R04/18) Dear Notary Public: This notary public brochure will help you become familiar with the duties and responsibilities of a notary public. It includes requirements and directions for the commission application, sample jurats and answers to common questions about the role of the notary. We would also like to recommend that you take the free online notary public educational tutorial course. The tutorial includes specific instructions for and examples of the proper execution of notarial acts, knowledge quizzes and a final assessment exam. These aids are designed to enable you to feel confident in your performance of your duties as a notary public. The tutorial is available online at: www.wdfi.org Although the brochure and tutorial discuss in detail your duties as a notary, we encourage you to contact Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions (WDFI) if you have additional questions concerning your responsibilities as a public officer. We are here to assist you in any way that we can. Mail Address: Street Address: Notary Section Notary Section WI Department of Financial Institutions WI Department of Financial Institutions PO Box 7847 4822 Madison Yards Way, North Tower Madison WI 53707 Madison WI 53705 Phone: 608-266-8915 Fax: 608-264-7965 Email: [email protected] TTY: 711 Website: www.wdfi.org 2 Table of Contents General Information Pages 4 – 7 Powers & Liabilities Pages 7 – 9 Notarial Acts Pages 9 – 10 Notarial Ceremonies Pages 11 – 15 Maintenance Pages 15 – 17 Statutory References Pages 17 3 General Information What is a Notary Public? A notary public is an individual issued an appointment by the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions to serve the public as an impartial witness, performing notarial acts as are allowed or required by law.

Notaries in Special Positions GOVERNOR'S REFERENCE MANUAL FOR NOTARIES 23 Government Employees as Notaries Public government agency, i.e., state, county, or municipal, Ais authorized to pay the cost of securing a notary commission for one or more of its employees. Such cost is deemed to be an expense of the agency. See sections 116.35 and 116.36, Florida Statutes. Based upon research and interpretation of the applicable laws, the following statements reflect the position of the Governor’s Notary Section regarding government employees who are notaries: I Although the government agency pays for the commission, it is the employee who is the appointed notary public, not the agency. Such employee-notary is a notary public 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for the entire 4-year term of appointment, unless the notary dies, resigns, or is suspended or removed from office by the Governor or the Florida Senate. I The government agency may set regulations regarding the use of the notary’s commission during the employee-notary’s regular business hours. I All fees collected by the employee-notary for notary services rendered during business hours belong to the government agency, pursuant to sections 116.35—116.38. The government agency has the authority to set the notary fees to be charged by that agency for its notary services to the public, but such fees may not exceed the allowable fees specified in Chapter 117, Florida Statutes. I The employee-notary may perform notarial acts outside his employment and may charge fees for those notary services not exceeding the fees set by law.

Marquette Law Review Volume 99 Article 4 Issue 2 Winter 2015 The thicE al Limits of Discrediting the Truthful Witness: How Modern Ethics Rules Fail to Prevent Truthful Witnesses from Being Discredited Through Unethical Means Todd A. Berger Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Courts Commons, and the Evidence Commons Repository Citation Todd A. Berger, The Ethical Limits of Discrediting the Truthful Witness: How Modern Ethics Rules Fail to Prevent Truthful Witnesses from Being Discredited Through Unethical Means, 99 Marq. L. Rev. 283 (2015). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol99/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ETHICAL LIMITS OF DISCREDITING THE TRUTHFUL WITNESS: HOW MODERN ETHICS RULES FAIL TO PREVENT TRUTHFUL WITNESSES FROM BEING DISCREDITED THROUGH UNETHICAL MEANS TODD A. BERGER* Whether the criminal defense attorney may ethically discredit the truthful witness on cross-examination and later during closing argument has long been an area of controversy in legal ethics. The vast majority of scholarly discussion on this important ethical dilemma has examined it in the abstract, focusing on the defense attorney’s dual roles in a criminal justice system that is dedicated to searching for the truth while simultaneously requiring zealous advocacy even for the guiltiest of defendants. Unlike these previous works, this particular Article explores this dilemma from the perspective of the techniques that criminal defense attorney’s use on cross-examination and closing argument to cast doubt on the testimony of a credible witness.

Would I Lie to You? (An Examination of Eyewitness Testimony in a Criminal Trial) Judge Penelope Wass SC

Would I lie to you? (an examination of eyewitness testimony in a criminal trial) Judge Penelope Wass SC Legal Aid Conference June 2016 CONTENTS PAGE Memory and Reliability Introduction 2 Stages of Memory 2 (i) Encoding 2 (ii) Retention and Storage 3 (iii) Retrieval 3 Limits on Memory Acquisition 3 Estimator Variables 8 False Memories 9 Flashbulb Memories 10 System Variables and the Misinformation Effect 12 Implications of the Misinformation effect 14 Factors that Increase Susceptibility to Misinformation Effect 15 The Effect of the Passage of Time on Memory 15 Witness Stress 16 Weapons Focus 17 Exposure Duration 18 Distance Effect 18 The Effects of Eyewitness evidence on Judges 18 Legal Authorities Regarding Memory Reliability 19 Is a jury assisted by expert evidence or by directions? 23 Deception Versus Unreliability 25 Introduction 25 Physiological Responses 25 Non-Verbal Behaviour or Demeanour 26 Is Demeanour Reliable? 27 1 Memory and Reliability Introduction Notwithstanding what the Courts have said since before Federation, one of the greatest misconceptions we continue to have about memory is that it is largely an accurate recorder, faithfully transposing into our brain events as they occur. From a witness’ point of view, it is important to remember that whilst we often doubt the memories of others, we rarely question our own. However, all witnesses, no matter how seemingly reliable and honest, are accessing changing or changeable data. The process of experiencing or acquiring, laying down or storing memory and then reproducing an account, all of which is involved in “recalling or “remembering”, and therefore giving evidence in a criminal trial, is disconcertingly malleable.

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND September Term 2019 No. 1253 IN RE: S.B. On Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Hon. Emanuel Brown, presiding) BRIEF OF APPELLANT PAUL B. DEWOLFE NICOLAS Y. RILEY * Office of the Public Defender Assigned Public Defender 6 St. Paul Street, Suite 1400 Institute for Constitutional Advocacy Baltimore, MD 2102 & Protection Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Ave. NW Washington, DC 20001 202-662-9042 [email protected] * Admitted pursuant to Rule 19-217. March 9, 2020 Counsel for Appellant TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS . i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE . 1 QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 3 STATEMENT OF FACTS . 4 A. July 2018: Adjudication Hearing Before Magistrate . 4 B. State’s First Exception . 9 C. February 2019: Hearing Before Magistrate On Remand . 10 D. State’s Second Exception .

In the name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful * LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATED _ _ _ _ /_ _/20_ _ I, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , an American citizen/resident presently residing at _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ being of sound mind and memory, do hereby revoke any and all former Wills and codicils made by me, and do make, direct, publish, and declare this my last Will and Testament. At the time of the execution of this Will, my immediate family consists of: My HUSBAND/WIFE, _______________________ herein sometimes referred to as “SPOUSE,” and my children, ______ born __________, ____, ________ born ____________, ____, ________ , born ______, ____, _________ born _________, ____, and __________, born ______, ____ herein sometimes referred to as “child” or “children”. Preamble I bear witness that there is no deity but Allah, the One, the Merciful, the Almighty -- Creator of the heavens and the earth and all therein -- God of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, and all the Prophets, mercy and peace be upon them all. He is One God and He has no partner. And I bear witness that the Prophet Muhammad is His Servant and His Messenger and the last of all the Prophets, mercy and peace be upon him. I bear witness that Allah is the Truth, that His promise is Truth, that the Meeting with Him is truth.

Document:- A/CN.4/43 Second Report on the Law of Treaties: Revised articles of the draft convention by Mr. J.L. Brierly, Special Rapporteur Topic: Law of Treaties Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission:- 1951 , vol. II Downloaded from the web site of the International Law Commission (http://www.un.org/law/ilc/index.htm) Copyright © United Nations LAW OF TREATIES DOCUMENT A/CN.4/43 Second report : Revised articles of the draft convention, by Mr. J. L. Brierly, Special Rapporteur [Original text: English] [10 April 1951 TABLE OF CONTENTS Text of revised articles on treaties Page Article I. Conclusion of treaties . 70 Article 2. Entry into force of treaties . 71 Article 3. Application of treaties . 71 Article 4. Ratification of treaties . 72 Article 5. When ratification is necessary . 72 Article 6. Date of entry into force of treaties . 72 Article 7. Obligation of a signatory prior to the entry into force of a treaty 73 Article 8. No obligation to ratify . 73 Article 9. Accession to treaties . 73 The draft articles which follow are submitted as a deemed to have duly signed or initialed the treaty basis of discussion alternative to articles 6, 7, 8,9 and 10 within the meaning of sub-paragraph (a). of my report of last year. The Commission will see that they follow the traditional terminology as to Comment ratification and accession. A distinction is drawn between two stages in the making of treaties (a) conclusion (b) entry into force. CONCLUSION OF TREATIES This distinction and the language in which it is expressed correspond entirely to the actual practice of States.

ILLINOISILLINOIS NOTARYNOTARY PUBLIC PUBLIC HANDBOOKHANDBOOK JesseJesse WhiteWhite SecretarySecretary ofof StateState Dear Friend: This handbook outlines the important duties of a notary public. The Illinois Notary Public Act, effective July 1, 1986, was passed to better meet the needs of the modern business world. Effective June 13, 2000, under certain conditions, residents of states bordering Illinois may be commissioned as Illinois notaries. Following are basic rules for proper and safe notarization: 1) Keep your notary seal in a safe place; 2) Do not notarize a signature unless the signer is present at the time of notarization; 3) Do not lend your stamp to anyone, including your employer; 4) Do not identify a document signer on the word of a friend or employer who is not willing to take an oath; 5) Sign your name on notarial certificates exactly as it appears on your commission and affix your seal. I encourage you to read this handbook thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact: Office of the Secretary of State, Index Department, 111 E. Monroe St., Springfield, IL 62756. Sincerely, Jesse White Secretary of State CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION Page Introduction. 4 Appointment . 4 Bond . 5 Seal .

NO. 18-_____ In the Supreme Court of the United States SHANKER PATEL, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the State of California, Second District Court of Appeals PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI COREY EVAN PARKER, ESQ. COUNSEL OF RECORD LAW OFFICE OF COREY EVAN PARKER 1230 ROSECRANS AVE, SUITE 300 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 (424) 456-3193 [email protected] MAY 13, 2019 SUPREME COURT PRESS ♦ (888) 958-5705 ♦ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS i QUESTION PRESENTED Where in sixteen States, including California, whence this present case arises, the law requires cor- roboration of an accomplice’s testimony to sustain a conviction, and When no physical evidence connects a defendant to the crime and the evidence of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is supplied solely by cir- cumstantial evidence, by the trial testimony of an accomplice, and by the out-of-court statements made by another accomplice, and When the defendant requests that the trial court give to the jury a cautionary instruction about the care with which the jury should face accomplice cor- roboration, THE QUESTION HERE PRESENTED IS: Whether a trial court violates the jury trial guarantees of the Sixth Amendment and U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 3 by refusing to grant a defendant’s request that the court instruct the jury that the evidence of accomplices ought to be received with suspicion and with the very greatest care and caution and ought not to be passed upon by the jury under the same rules governing other and apparently credible witnesses.

Unauthorized Practice of Law--The Ulf L Service Bank That Was: Bank Cashier Enjoined from Preparing Real Estate Mortgages to Secure Bank Loans Maxwell P